| Title |
Parent–offspring conflict unlikely to explain ‘child marriage’ in northwestern Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Human Behaviour, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-019-0535-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan B. Schaffnit, Anushé Hassan, Mark Urassa, David W. Lawson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 27% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 73% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,309,221
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#990
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,395
of 358,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#39
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 160.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.