| Title |
Subsets of exhausted CD8+ T cells differentially mediate tumor control and respond to checkpoint blockade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Immunology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41590-019-0312-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian C. Miller, Debattama R. Sen, Rose Al Abosy, Kevin Bi, Yamini V. Virkud, Martin W. LaFleur, Kathleen B. Yates, Ana Lako, Kristen Felt, Girish S. Naik, Michael Manos, Evisa Gjini, Juhi R. Kuchroo, Jeffrey J. Ishizuka, Jenna L. Collier, Gabriel K. Griffin, Seth Maleri, Dawn E. Comstock, Sarah A. Weiss, Flavian D. Brown, Arpit Panda, Margaret D. Zimmer, Robert T. Manguso, F. Stephen Hodi, Scott J. Rodig, Arlene H. Sharpe, W. Nicholas Haining |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 39% |
| Japan | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 57% |
| Scientists | 39 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 262 | 21% |
| Researcher | 238 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 88 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 5% |
| Other | 147 | 12% |
| Unknown | 391 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 273 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 235 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 9% |
| Engineering | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 6% |
| Unknown | 421 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#532,690
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#366
of 4,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,184
of 367,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#11
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.