| Title |
Black smokers, massive sulphides and vent biota at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1038/321033a0 |
| Authors |
P. A. Rona, G. Klinkhammer, T. A. Nelsen, J. H. Trefry, H. Elderfield |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 54 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1992.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,422
of 90,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,963
of 10,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#87
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.