| Title |
Removal of a gadolinium based contrast agent by a novel sorbent hemoperfusion in a chronic kidney disease (CKD) rodent model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-37348-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Worapol Ngamcherdtrakul, Jingga Morry, Thanapon Sangvanich, Moataz Reda, Daniel S. Bejan, Glen E. Fryxell, Wassana Yantasee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,433,537
of 24,225,722 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#21,324
of 131,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,429
of 445,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#624
of 3,272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,225,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.