↓ Skip to main content

Deregulation of cyclin E and D1 in breast cancer is associated with inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein

Overview of attention for article published in Oncogene, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Deregulation of cyclin E and D1 in breast cancer is associated with inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein
Published in
Oncogene, January 1997
DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1200833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels H Nielsen, Stefan O Emdin, Jenny Cajander, Göran Landberg

Abstract

Inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) by mutations or abnormal phosphorylation is a mechanism by which tumour cells can subdue normal growth control. Among molecules involved in control of pRB phosphorylation, cyclin D1 and E have been found to be deregulated and overexpressed in various types of cancers. In order to study the cell cycle regulatory mechanisms in breast cancer, we have analysed the protein expression of cyclin D1 and E in 114 tumour specimens from patients with primary breast cancer using Western blotting. Twenty-five out of 34 tumours with overexpression of cyclin E showed uniform low cyclin D1 expression, and by immunohistochemical analysis of pRB we present evidence for the existence of pRB defects in approximately 40% of these tumours in contrast to no pRB defects in the other group of tumours. This result was supported by a high protein expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16 in 44% of the tumours with high cyclin E and low D1 expression, and all immunohistochemical pRB defect tumours showed a high p16 protein level. Additionally, an abnormal low pRB phosphorylation in relation to a high proliferative activity and loss of heterozygosity of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene locus were found in all but one tumour with immunohistochemical defect pRB. Interestingly, tumours with high cyclin E and low D1 expression were generally oestrogen receptor negative suggesting a role for cell cycle regulators in the mechanisms leading to oestrogen independent tumour growth. Furthermore, the prognosis differed markedly for the patients in the various groups of tumours, indicating that the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer pathogenesis and the clinical course in part could be explained by different and distinctive sets of cell cycle defects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Oncogene
#4,352
of 10,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,984
of 91,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncogene
#22
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.