| Title |
Stochastic synaptic plasticity underlying compulsion in a model of addiction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0789-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent Pascoli, Agnès Hiver, Ruud Van Zessen, Michaël Loureiro, Ridouane Achargui, Masaya Harada, Jérôme Flakowski, Christian Lüscher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 10 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 64% |
| Scientists | 33 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 384 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 23% |
| Researcher | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 148 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 7% |
| Psychology | 20 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 96 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#301,777
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#16,333
of 97,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,516
of 448,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#366
of 977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.