| Title |
Hidden heterogeneity and circadian-controlled cell fate inferred from single cell lineages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07788-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaon Chakrabarti, Andrew L. Paek, Jose Reyes, Kathleen A. Lasick, Galit Lahav, Franziska Michor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 36% |
| India | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 50% |
| Scientists | 17 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 27% |
| Researcher | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,498,761
of 24,930,865 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,468
of 54,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,179
of 446,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#560
of 1,300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,930,865 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.