↓ Skip to main content

Adenosine is crucial for deep brain stimulation–mediated attenuation of tremor

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Adenosine is crucial for deep brain stimulation–mediated attenuation of tremor
Published in
Nature Medicine, December 2007
DOI 10.1038/nm1693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lane Bekar, Witold Libionka, Guo-Feng Tian, Qiwu Xu, Arnulfo Torres, Xiaohai Wang, Ditte Lovatt, Erika Williams, Takahiro Takano, Jurgen Schnermann, Robert Bakos, Maiken Nedergaard

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used neurosurgical approach to treating tremor and other movement disorders. In addition, the use of DBS in a number of psychiatric diseases, including obsessive-compulsive disorders and depression, is currently being tested. Despite the rapid increase in the number of individuals with surgically implanted stimulation electrodes, the cellular pathways involved in mediating the effects of DBS remain unknown. Here we show that DBS is associated with a marked increase in the release of ATP, resulting in accumulation of its catabolic product, adenosine. Adenosine A1 receptor activation depresses excitatory transmission in the thalamus and reduces both tremor- and DBS-induced side effects. Intrathalamic infusion of A1 receptor agonists directly reduces tremor, whereas adenosine A1 receptor-null mice show involuntary movements and seizure at stimulation intensities below the therapeutic level. Furthermore, our data indicate that endogenous adenosine mechanisms are active in tremor, thus supporting the clinical notion that caffeine, a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist, can trigger or exacerbate essential tremor. Our findings suggest that nonsynaptic mechanisms involving the activation of A1 receptors suppress tremor activity and limit stimulation-induced side effects, thereby providing a new pharmacological target to replace or improve the efficacy of DBS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 211 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 9%
Professor 17 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 51 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 18%
Engineering 17 7%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,950,606
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#3,475
of 8,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,881
of 163,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#12
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.