| Title |
Guiding interoperable electronic health records through patient-sharing networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-018-0072-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan M. Clarke, Leigh R. Warren, Sonal Arora, Mauricio Barahona, Ara W. Darzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 61% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Design | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,003,890
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#408
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,142
of 436,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.