Title |
Trophoblast organoids as a model for maternal–fetal interactions during human placentation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0753-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margherita Y. Turco, Lucy Gardner, Richard G. Kay, Russell S. Hamilton, Malwina Prater, Michael S. Hollinshead, Alasdair McWhinnie, Laura Esposito, Ridma Fernando, Helen Skelton, Frank Reimann, Fiona M. Gribble, Andrew Sharkey, Steven G. E. Marsh, Stephen O’Rahilly, Myriam Hemberger, Graham J. Burton, Ashley Moffett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 307 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 62 | 20% |
United States | 47 | 15% |
Canada | 12 | 4% |
India | 12 | 4% |
France | 10 | 3% |
Germany | 7 | 2% |
Sweden | 7 | 2% |
Mexico | 5 | 2% |
Spain | 5 | 2% |
Other | 39 | 13% |
Unknown | 101 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 162 | 53% |
Scientists | 127 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 690 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 690 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 117 | 17% |
Researcher | 106 | 15% |
Student > Master | 83 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 5% |
Other | 86 | 12% |
Unknown | 207 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 182 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 38 | 6% |
Engineering | 23 | 3% |
Other | 79 | 11% |
Unknown | 226 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 539. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#46,037
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,872
of 98,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#837
of 447,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#89
of 1,031 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,031 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.