↓ Skip to main content

Macrophage elastase kills bacteria within murine macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Macrophage elastase kills bacteria within murine macrophages
Published in
Nature, June 2009
DOI 10.1038/nature08181
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. McGarry Houghton, William O. Hartzell, Clinton S. Robbins, F. Xavier Gomis-Rüth, Steven D. Shapiro

Abstract

Macrophages are aptly positioned to function as the primary line of defence against invading pathogens in many organs, including the lung and peritoneum. Their ability to phagocytose and clear microorganisms has been well documented. Macrophages possess several substances with which they can kill bacteria, including reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and antimicrobial proteins. We proposed that macrophage-derived proteinases may contribute to the antimicrobial properties of macrophages. Macrophage elastase (also known as matrix metalloproteinase 12 or MMP12) is an enzyme predominantly expressed in mature tissue macrophages and is implicated in several disease processes, including emphysema. Physiological functions for MMP12 have not been described. Here we show that Mmp12(-/-) mice exhibit impaired bacterial clearance and increased mortality when challenged with both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria at macrophage-rich portals of entry, such as the peritoneum and lung. Intracellular stores of MMP12 are mobilized to macrophage phagolysosomes after the ingestion of bacterial pathogens. Once inside phagolysosomes, MMP12 adheres to bacterial cell walls where it disrupts cellular membranes resulting in bacterial death. The antimicrobial properties of MMP12 do not reside within its catalytic domain, but rather within the carboxy-terminal domain. This domain contains a unique four amino acid sequence on an exposed beta loop of the protein that is required for the observed antimicrobial activity. The present study represents, to our knowledge, the first report of direct antimicrobial activity by a matrix metallopeptidase, and describes a new antimicrobial peptide that is sequentially and structurally unique in nature.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Australia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 163 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 9%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 12 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 10%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 15 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#84,228
of 90,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,753
of 110,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#464
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.