↓ Skip to main content

Multi-channel seismic imaging of a crustal magma chamber along the East Pacific Rise

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
644 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Multi-channel seismic imaging of a crustal magma chamber along the East Pacific Rise
Published in
Nature, March 1987
DOI 10.1038/326035a0
Authors

R. S. Detrick, P. Buhl, E. Vera, J. Mutter, J. Orcutt, J. Madsen, T. Brocher

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 96 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 27%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 15 15%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 79 77%
Mathematics 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,190,744
of 13,926,825 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#50,249
of 70,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,356
of 259,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#651
of 684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,926,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.