| Title |
“There is nothing so practical as a good theory”: a pragmatic guide for selecting theoretical approaches for implementation projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3671-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Lynch, Alison Mudge, Sarah Knowles, Alison L. Kitson, Sarah C. Hunter, Gill Harvey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 185 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 47 | 25% |
| Australia | 28 | 15% |
| Canada | 11 | 6% |
| United States | 11 | 6% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 3 | 2% |
| Guyana | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 66 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 45% |
| Scientists | 78 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 334 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 19% |
| Unknown | 85 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 12% |
| Psychology | 39 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 104 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#332,473
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#51
of 8,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,705
of 355,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.