| Title |
Autophagy maintains tumour growth through circulating arginine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0697-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Poillet-Perez, Xiaoqi Xie, Le Zhan, Yang Yang, Daniel W. Sharp, Zhixian Sherrie Hu, Xiaoyang Su, Anurag Maganti, Cherry Jiang, Wenyun Lu, Haiyan Zheng, Marcus W. Bosenberg, Janice M. Mehnert, Jessie Yanxiang Guo, Edmund Lattime, Joshua D. Rabinowitz, Eileen White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 31% |
| France | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 59% |
| Scientists | 34 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 305 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 18% |
| Researcher | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 94 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#770,559
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#28,263
of 98,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,890
of 355,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#610
of 1,071 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,071 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.