↓ Skip to main content

Noise Reduction in Complex Biological Switches

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Noise Reduction in Complex Biological Switches
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep20214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Cardelli, Attila Csikász-Nagy, Neil Dalchau, Mirco Tribastone, Max Tschaikowski

Abstract

Cells operate in noisy molecular environments via complex regulatory networks. It is possible to understand how molecular counts are related to noise in specific networks, but it is not generally clear how noise relates to network complexity, because different levels of complexity also imply different overall number of molecules. For a fixed function, does increased network complexity reduce noise, beyond the mere increase of overall molecular counts? If so, complexity could provide an advantage counteracting the costs involved in maintaining larger networks. For that purpose, we investigate how noise affects multistable systems, where a small amount of noise could lead to very different outcomes; thus we turn to biochemical switches. Our method for comparing networks of different structure and complexity is to place them in conditions where they produce exactly the same deterministic function. We are then in a good position to compare their noise characteristics relatively to their identical deterministic traces. We show that more complex networks are better at coping with both intrinsic and extrinsic noise. Intrinsic noise tends to decrease with complexity, and extrinsic noise tends to have less impact. Our findings suggest a new role for increased complexity in biological networks, at parity of function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 2%
India 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 32%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 27%
Engineering 4 6%
Computer Science 4 6%
Mathematics 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,834,976
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#72,345
of 123,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,950
of 398,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,994
of 3,314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.