Title |
Metagenomics uncovers gaps in amplicon-based detection of microbial diversity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Microbiology, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.32 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh, Natalia N. Ivanova, Tanja Woyke, Nikos C. Kyrpides |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 30% |
Spain | 4 | 5% |
France | 4 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
Germany | 3 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 40 | 54% |
Members of the public | 32 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 2% |
Denmark | 4 | 1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 367 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 25% |
Researcher | 78 | 20% |
Student > Master | 45 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
Other | 59 | 15% |
Unknown | 58 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 75 | 19% |
Environmental Science | 32 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 6% |
Unknown | 73 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#825,266
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#869
of 2,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,704
of 408,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#22
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.