| Title |
Large contribution to inland water CO2 and CH4 emissions from very small ponds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo2654 |
| Authors |
Meredith A. Holgerson, Peter A. Raymond |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 48% |
| Scientists | 23 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 583 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 120 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 95 | 16% |
| Researcher | 92 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 10% |
| Unknown | 135 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 200 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 79 | 13% |
| Engineering | 20 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Unknown | 176 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#234,545
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#515
of 3,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,164
of 411,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#14
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.