| Title |
FLIRT: fast local infrared thermogenetics for subcellular control of protein function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-018-0168-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophia M. Hirsch, Sriramkumar Sundaramoorthy, Tim Davies, Yelena Zhuravlev, Jennifer C. Waters, Mimi Shirasu-Hiza, Julien Dumont, Julie C. Canman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 57% |
| Scientists | 20 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 28% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,077,387
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,389
of 5,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,183
of 364,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#33
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.