| Title |
Electrical impedance tomography in acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2195-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Consuelo Bachmann, Caio Morais, Guillermo Bugedo, Alejandro Bruhn, Arturo Morales, João B Borges, Eduardo Costa, Jaime Retamal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 22% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 38% |
| Engineering | 32 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,237,026
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,045
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,782
of 361,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#28
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.