| Title |
Experience-independent sex differences in newborn macaques: Females are more social than males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep19669 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Simpson, Ylenia Nicolini, Melissa Shetler, Stephen J. Suomi, Pier F. Ferrari, Annika Paukner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 368 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 70 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 6% |
| United States | 22 | 6% |
| Argentina | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Unknown | 198 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 328 | 89% |
| Scientists | 30 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#125,264
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,561
of 142,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,094
of 406,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#31
of 3,289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.