↓ Skip to main content

Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)


180 Dimensions

Readers on

666 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness
Published in
Nature, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature16524
Pubmed ID

James B. Grace, T. Michael Anderson, Eric W. Seabloom, Elizabeth T. Borer, Peter B. Adler, W. Stanley Harpole, Yann Hautier, Helmut Hillebrand, Eric M. Lind, Meelis Pärtel, Jonathan D. Bakker, Yvonne M. Buckley, Michael J. Crawley, Ellen I. Damschen, Kendi F. Davies, Philip A. Fay, Jennifer Firn, Daniel S. Gruner, Andy Hector, Johannes M. H. Knops, Andrew S. MacDougall, Brett A. Melbourne, John W. Morgan, John L. Orrock, Suzanne M. Prober, Melinda D. Smith


How ecosystem productivity and species richness are interrelated is one of the most debated subjects in the history of ecology. Decades of intensive study have yet to discern the actual mechanisms behind observed global patterns. Here, by integrating the predictions from multiple theories into a single model and using data from 1,126 grassland plots spanning five continents, we detect the clear signals of numerous underlying mechanisms linking productivity and richness. We find that an integrative model has substantially higher explanatory power than traditional bivariate analyses. In addition, the specific results unveil several surprising findings that conflict with classical models. These include the isolation of a strong and consistent enhancement of productivity by richness, an effect in striking contrast with superficial data patterns. Also revealed is a consistent importance of competition across the full range of productivity values, in direct conflict with some (but not all) proposed models. The promotion of local richness by macroecological gradients in climatic favourability, generally seen as a competing hypothesis, is also found to be important in our analysis. The results demonstrate that an integrative modelling approach leads to a major advance in our ability to discern the underlying processes operating in ecological systems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 666 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Switzerland 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 622 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 171 26%
Researcher 165 25%
Student > Master 103 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 7%
Unspecified 46 7%
Other 133 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 306 46%
Environmental Science 222 33%
Unspecified 83 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 28 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
of 13,396,110 outputs
Outputs from Nature
of 69,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 361,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
of 936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.