↓ Skip to main content

When should I be considering home oxygen for my patients?

Overview of attention for article published in npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
When should I be considering home oxygen for my patients?
Published in
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay Suntharalingam, Sabrine Hippolyte, Vikki Knowles, Daryl Freeman, Irem Patel, Maxine Hardinge

Abstract

The ability to provide oxygen in a patient's home can offer enormous benefits, including improvements in life expectancy when given in the appropriate setting. Confusingly, however, home oxygen is available in many forms, including long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), ambulatory oxygen therapy (AOT), palliative oxygen therapy (POT) and short-burst oxygen therapy (SBOT)-each with varying degrees of supporting evidence. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) has recently published new guidance on home oxygen therapy, after collating the available evidence. This article aims to summarise those guidelines, focusing on who should and should not be considered for oxygen therapy. Although the BTS guidelines target a UK audience, many of the principles covered below are applicable internationally, even if the availability of certain oxygen modalities and supporting service arrangements may vary between different healthcare systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 20%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 20%