| Title |
Pathogen elimination by probiotic Bacillus via signalling interference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0616-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pipat Piewngam, Yue Zheng, Thuan H. Nguyen, Seth W. Dickey, Hwang-Soo Joo, Amer E. Villaruz, Kyle A. Glose, Emilie L. Fisher, Rachelle L. Hunt, Barry Li, Janice Chiou, Sujiraphong Pharkjaksu, Sunisa Khongthong, Gordon Y. C. Cheung, Pattarachai Kiratisin, Michael Otto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 595 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 131 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 48 | 8% |
| Canada | 20 | 3% |
| France | 17 | 3% |
| Spain | 14 | 2% |
| Germany | 12 | 2% |
| Japan | 11 | 2% |
| India | 10 | 2% |
| Italy | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 115 | 19% |
| Unknown | 208 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 339 | 57% |
| Scientists | 222 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 811 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 811 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 18% |
| Researcher | 130 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 88 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 127 | 16% |
| Unknown | 204 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 166 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 144 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 109 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 88 | 11% |
| Unknown | 239 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 509. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#51,540
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,203
of 98,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,000
of 358,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#105
of 1,126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.