↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for facultative protocarnivory in Capsella bursa-pastoris seeds

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for facultative protocarnivory in Capsella bursa-pastoris seeds
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-28564-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hattie R. Roberts, John M. Warren, Jim Provan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 27%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 32%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,004,989
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,082
of 100,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,464
of 288,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them