↓ Skip to main content

Spider taxonomists catch data on web

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Spider taxonomists catch data on web
Published in
Nature, December 2015
DOI 10.1038/528479a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Nentwig, Daniel Gloor, Christian Kropf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 33%
Professor 4 22%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#653,911
of 12,771,232 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#23,232
of 66,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,907
of 354,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#642
of 868 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,771,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 868 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.