| Title |
Base editing a CRISPR way
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-018-0146-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivien Marx |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 45% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 52% |
| Scientists | 15 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#708,039
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#918
of 5,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,336
of 350,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#19
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.