↓ Skip to main content

Extreme amyloid polymorphism in Staphylococcus aureus virulent PSMα peptides

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Extreme amyloid polymorphism in Staphylococcus aureus virulent PSMα peptides
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05490-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nir Salinas, Jacques-Philippe Colletier, Asher Moshe, Meytal Landau

Abstract

Members of the Staphylococcus aureus phenol-soluble modulin (PSM) peptide family are secreted as functional amyloids that serve diverse roles in pathogenicity and may be present as full-length peptides or as naturally occurring truncations. We recently showed that the activity of PSMα3, the most toxic member, stems from the formation of cross-α fibrils, which are at variance with the cross-β fibrils linked with eukaryotic amyloid pathologies. Here, we show that PSMα1 and PSMα4, involved in biofilm structuring, form canonical cross-β amyloid fibrils wherein β-sheets tightly mate through steric zipper interfaces, conferring high stability. Contrastingly, a truncated PSMα3 has antibacterial activity, forms reversible fibrils, and reveals two polymorphic and atypical β-rich fibril architectures. These architectures are radically different from both the cross-α fibrils formed by full-length PSMα3, and from the canonical cross-β fibrils. Our results point to structural plasticity being at the basis of the functional diversity exhibited by S. aureus PSMαs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 30%
Chemistry 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Engineering 8 8%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,786,050
of 24,150,351 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,846
of 51,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,715
of 338,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#835
of 1,448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,150,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.