↓ Skip to main content

Whole genome expression and biochemical correlates of extreme constitutional types defined in Ayurveda

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Whole genome expression and biochemical correlates of extreme constitutional types defined in Ayurveda
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-6-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhavana Prasher, Sapna Negi, Shilpi Aggarwal, Amit K Mandal, Tav P Sethi, Shailaja R Deshmukh, Sudha G Purohit, Shantanu Sengupta, Sangeeta Khanna, Farhan Mohammad, Gaurav Garg, Samir K Brahmachari, Indian Genome Variation Consortium, Mitali Mukerji

Abstract

Ayurveda is an ancient system of personalized medicine documented and practiced in India since 1500 B.C. According to this system an individual's basic constitution to a large extent determines predisposition and prognosis to diseases as well as therapy and life-style regime. Ayurveda describes seven broad constitution types (Prakritis) each with a varying degree of predisposition to different diseases. Amongst these, three most contrasting types, Vata, Pitta, Kapha, are the most vulnerable to diseases. In the realm of modern predictive medicine, efforts are being directed towards capturing disease phenotypes with greater precision for successful identification of markers for prospective disease conditions. In this study, we explore whether the different constitution types as described in Ayurveda has molecular correlates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 13 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Engineering 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 31 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,044,790
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#211
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,231
of 98,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them