↓ Skip to main content

Policy statement on folic acid and neural tube defects

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Policy statement on folic acid and neural tube defects
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1097/gim.0b013e31821d4188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helga V Toriello

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#1,227
of 2,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,897
of 122,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.