↓ Skip to main content

Visible inequality breeds more inequality

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
55 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Visible inequality breeds more inequality
Published in
Nature, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/526333a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Gächter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 13%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Computer Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#748,823
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#27,902
of 98,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,974
of 291,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#566
of 1,091 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,091 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.