↓ Skip to main content

Membrane stiffening by STOML3 facilitates mechanosensation in sensory neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Membrane stiffening by STOML3 facilitates mechanosensation in sensory neurons
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms9512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanmei Qi, Laura Andolfi, Flavia Frattini, Florian Mayer, Marco Lazzarino, Jing Hu

Abstract

Sensing force is crucial to maintain the viability of all living cells. Despite its fundamental importance, how force is sensed at the molecular level remains largely unknown. Here we show that stomatin-like protein-3 (STOML3) controls membrane mechanics by binding cholesterol and thus facilitates force transfer and tunes the sensitivity of mechano-gated channels, including Piezo channels. STOML3 is detected in cholesterol-rich lipid rafts. In mouse sensory neurons, depletion of cholesterol and deficiency of STOML3 similarly and interdependently attenuate mechanosensitivity while modulating membrane mechanics. In heterologous systems, intact STOML3 is required to maintain membrane mechanics to sensitize Piezo1 and Piezo2 channels. In C57BL/6N, but not STOML3(-/-) mice, tactile allodynia is attenuated by cholesterol depletion, suggesting that membrane stiffening by STOML3 is essential for mechanical sensitivity. Targeting the STOML3-cholesterol association might offer an alternative strategy for control of chronic pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 32%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 20%
Neuroscience 34 19%
Engineering 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 25 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,165,012
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17,482
of 47,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,481
of 278,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#285
of 759 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 759 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.