| Title |
Non-small-cell lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrdp.2015.48 |
| Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,689,694
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#609
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,324
of 266,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.