↓ Skip to main content

Geology: The continental conundrum

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
175 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Geology: The continental conundrum
Published in
Nature, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/526192a
Authors

Ted Nield

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#391,666
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#19,512
of 98,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,427
of 289,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#415
of 1,079 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,079 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.