| Title |
Nobels: Toll pioneers deserve recognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/479178a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James P. Allison, Christophe Benoist, Alexander V. Chervonsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Latvia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 38% |
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#687,404
of 24,562,945 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#26,458
of 95,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,647
of 146,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#273
of 1,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,562,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.