↓ Skip to main content

Nobels: Toll pioneers deserve recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Nobels: Toll pioneers deserve recognition
Published in
Nature, November 2011
DOI 10.1038/479178a
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P. Allison, Christophe Benoist, Alexander V. Chervonsky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
India 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 26 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 36%
Researcher 9 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 45%
Environmental Science 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#395,854
of 16,575,021 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#19,735
of 77,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,513
of 93,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#209
of 696 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,575,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 88.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 696 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.