↓ Skip to main content

Do we need an ethics of self-organizing tissue?

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Do we need an ethics of self-organizing tissue?
Published in
Nature Methods, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3618
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 5%
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Engineering 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,585,596
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,822
of 4,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,067
of 274,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#37
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.