↓ Skip to main content

MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1087 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling
Published in
Nature Methods, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duy Tin Truong, Eric A Franzosa, Timothy L Tickle, Matthias Scholz, George Weingart, Edoardo Pasolli, Adrian Tett, Curtis Huttenhower, Nicola Segata

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1103 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 279 25%
Researcher 215 19%
Student > Master 150 13%
Student > Bachelor 95 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 5%
Other 153 14%
Unknown 186 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 322 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 265 23%
Computer Science 68 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 64 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 5%
Other 129 11%
Unknown 233 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,004,626
of 19,163,209 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,306
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,024
of 260,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#32
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,163,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.