| Title |
No substantial long-term bias in the Cenozoic benthic foraminifera oxygen-isotope record
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-05303-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Evans, Marcus P. S. Badger, Gavin L. Foster, Michael J. Henehan, Caroline H. Lear, James C. Zachos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 37% |
| United States | 7 | 26% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,355,099
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#20,384
of 57,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,017
of 341,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#523
of 1,324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.