| Title |
Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and wANNOVAR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Protocols, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nprot.2015.105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Yang, Kai Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 664 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 649 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 137 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 14% |
| Unknown | 143 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 200 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 150 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 6% |
| Unknown | 162 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,184,956
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#807
of 2,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,529
of 284,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#16
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.