↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of a biofilm-specific reaction rate: kinetics of bacterial urea hydrolysis in a biofilm

Overview of attention for article published in npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Estimation of a biofilm-specific reaction rate: kinetics of bacterial urea hydrolysis in a biofilm
Published in
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2015.14
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M Connolly, Benjamin Jackson, Adam P Rothman, Isaac Klapper, Robin Gerlach

Abstract

Biofilms and specifically urea-hydrolysing biofilms are of interest to the medical community (for example, urinary tract infections), scientists and engineers (for example, microbially induced carbonate precipitation). To appropriately model these systems, biofilm-specific reaction rates are required. A simple method for determining biofilm-specific reaction rates is described and applied to a urea-hydrolysing biofilm. Biofilms were grown in small silicon tubes and influent and effluent urea concentrations were determined. Immediately after sampling, the tubes were thin sectioned to estimate the biofilm thickness profile along the length of the tube. Urea concentration and biofilm thickness data were used to construct an inverse model for the estimation of the urea hydrolysis rate. It was found that urea hydrolysis in Escherichia coli MJK2 biofilms is well approximated by first-order kinetics between urea concentrations of 0.003 and 0.221 mol/l (0.186 and 13.3 g/l). The first-order rate coefficient (k1) was estimated to be 23.2±6.2 h(-1). It was also determined that advection dominated the experimental system rather than diffusion, and that urea hydrolysis within the biofilms was not limited by diffusive transport. Beyond the specific urea-hydrolysing biofilm discussed in this work, the method has the potential for wide application in cases where biofilm-specific rates must be determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,213,964
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
#337
of 395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,401
of 245,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.