| Title |
Training for our digital future: a human-centered design approach to graduate medical education for aspiring clinician-innovators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-018-0034-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jocelyn Carter, Yanik J. Bababekov, Maulik D. Majmudar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,366,250
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#339
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,467
of 327,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.