| Title |
Evidence for human transmission of amyloid-β pathology and cerebral amyloid angiopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature15369 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zane Jaunmuktane, Simon Mead, Matthew Ellis, Jonathan D. F. Wadsworth, Andrew J. Nicoll, Joanna Kenny, Francesca Launchbury, Jacqueline Linehan, Angela Richard-Loendt, A. Sarah Walker, Peter Rudge, John Collinge, Sebastian Brandner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 278 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 36 | 13% |
| Spain | 12 | 4% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 115 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 191 | 69% |
| Scientists | 54 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 841 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 812 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 178 | 21% |
| Researcher | 139 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 119 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 161 | 19% |
| Unknown | 121 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 178 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 124 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 117 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 37 | 4% |
| Other | 101 | 12% |
| Unknown | 161 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1658. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,673
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#715
of 98,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 280,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.