| Title |
Two distinct influences of Arctic warming on cold winters over North America and East Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo2517 |
| Authors |
Jong-Seong Kug, Jee-Hoon Jeong, Yeon-Soo Jang, Baek-Min Kim, Chris K. Folland, Seung-Ki Min, Seok-Woo Son |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 26% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 2 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 60% |
| Scientists | 13 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 25% |
| Researcher | 60 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 161 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 84 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#174,299
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#389
of 3,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,995
of 278,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#11
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.