| Title |
Comparative analysis reveals signatures of differentiation amid genomic polymorphism in Lake Malawi cichlids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong-Hwee E Loh, Lee S Katz, Meryl C Mims, Thomas D Kocher, Soojin V Yi, J Todd Streelman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 113 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,626
of 95,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.