@richdatasci @WilliamCall19 @PrisonPlanet No they haven't https://t.co/aNWjBb9se2
@richdatasci @WilliamCall19 @PrisonPlanet Temperature was not stable people to 1800. It changed twice as fast during the periods 1400-1600 and 1200-1400 than it did between 1800 and 2000 https://t.co/aNWjBb9se2
RT @Kenneth72712993: @Damo__73_ "Nature is a renowned journal, is it not?" This Nature paper shows no modern uptick in global SSTs. https…
@Damo__73_ "Nature is a renowned journal, is it not?" This Nature paper shows no modern uptick in global SSTs. https://t.co/2m9QLy8DdK https://t.co/3vnb7DKZcf
RT @cmcateer3: @joe51du @DawnTJ90 @Brantfordbob59 Roman Warm Period & Medieval Warm Period were globally warmer than today at the ocean sur…
RT @cmcateer3: @joe51du @DawnTJ90 @Brantfordbob59 Roman Warm Period & Medieval Warm Period were globally warmer than today at the ocean sur…
@joe51du @DawnTJ90 @Brantfordbob59 Roman Warm Period & Medieval Warm Period were globally warmer than today at the ocean surface. It also affirms the LIA was “globally coherent.” https://t.co/RB80bcvPLd
RT @priscian: @KIVUNature @EC_Kosters @Marcusgibson @Kenneth72712993 Kenny/Rick has no problem with outright fabrication of data. https://t…
@KIVUNature @EC_Kosters @Marcusgibson @Kenneth72712993 Kenny/Rick has no problem with outright fabrication of data. https://t.co/Z3fyqVcKXi
@TassletineA @woodycartoons @Marcusgibson @GeorgeMonbiot Really? You have never used wftt? Yes, obviously it fucking counts - it's the data. Here is the paper link expired https://t.co/aNWjBba03A It warmed 5x faster in the early 20thC as shown in this pap
@Robert76907841 @Vman023Hatcher @UltraObamaX @douglasrasbash @ClimateHuman So Nature is 'disinformation' now? Ok Karen 🤦 https://t.co/aNWjBb9se2
@MettoolMan @passerinefundy @footballforfans @keke_coburn @Leonthehitman7 @donnadlu Current rate of change is 0.08 SD unit per century.. It was >x2 that in the period 1200-1400 and 1400-1600 https://t.co/aNWjBb9se2 Are you denying the science?
@ElliotB24839046 @TalkTV @TiceRichard @GeraldKutney The 1801-2000 temperature change for global SSTs has been 0.08 of a standard deviation unit per century. This is less than HALF of the rate of change during the 1201-1400 and 1401-1600 CE periods. https
@Blunter_ @tan123 @Styo28183449 @mikaelaloach "the difference"? https://t.co/xxq54RColw
@socratesccost @ClimateReality Stop the #lClimateCrisis BS Oceans were warmer in the past 👉🏼Robust global ocean cooling trend for the pre-industrial Common Era https://t.co/vvyEyExPHK
RT @TethLL: @iesholehs Oceans were warmer in the past 👉🏼Robust global ocean cooling trend for the pre-industrial Common Era https://t.co/tV…
RT @TethLL: @ProjectDrawdown @nytimes Stop the #ClimateCrisis BS 👉🏼 Oceans were warmer in the past 👉🏼Robust global ocean cooling trend for…
RT @TethLL: @GretaThunberg Stop the #ClimateCrisis BS 👉🏼Oceans were warmer in the past ‼️‼️‼️ Robust global ocean cooling trend for the pre…
RT @TethLL: @GretaThunberg Stop the #ClimateCrisis BS 👉🏼Oceans were warmer in the past ‼️‼️‼️ Robust global ocean cooling trend for the pre…
@EliotJacobson That's simply not true. Rate of change from from 1800-2000 was less than half the standard deviation units from 1400-1600 and 1200-1400. The first millennia was also far warmer. https://t.co/aNWjBb9se2
@JimBowersclimb @UseTechForGood @Fenku14 @1000Frolly @DavidBellamyUK Argo data shows no net change since 2005 (barring 2017 Niño) 1800 to 2000 show just 0.08 s.d. unit per century (half the rate of change from LIA) The entire first millennium was >1 s
@oakden_wolf "Robust?" Did you happen to catch the title of the paper, Oakden? It's one-word in. https://t.co/2m9QLy8DdK
@oakden_wolf "Read the damn excerpt" What excerpt? Read the Oceans2k paper on global SSTs. It says there was >2x more of a temperature change in the 1201-1400 and 1401-1600 bins than in the 1801-2000 bin (0.17 stand. dev. unit/100y vs. 0.08 stand. dev
RT @1000Frolly: Correct; and there have been at least 12 other periods of global warming in the Holocene, similar to the one we are experie…
RT @1000Frolly: Correct; and there have been at least 12 other periods of global warming in the Holocene, similar to the one we are experie…
Correct; and there have been at least 12 other periods of global warming in the Holocene, similar to the one we are experiencing now. It's very common.
@DatAndre_de @quarkswdr Niemand bestreitet die Erwaermung seit 1750. Sie ist aber im Rahmen des Holozaens unspektakulaer und war ein Segen fuer die Biosphaere. Der Pazifik enthaelt 50% des Volumens der Weltmeere & aehnliche Trends wurden auch global re