↓ Skip to main content

Decarboxylative sp3 C–N coupling via dual copper and photoredox catalysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
38 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
Title
Decarboxylative sp3 C–N coupling via dual copper and photoredox catalysis
Published in
Nature, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0234-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yufan Liang, Xiaheng Zhang, David W. C. MacMillan

Abstract

Over the past three decades, considerable progress has been made in the development of methods to construct sp2 carbon-nitrogen (C-N) bonds using palladium, copper or nickel catalysis1,2. However, the incorporation of alkyl substrates to form sp3 C-N bonds remains one of the major challenges in the field of cross-coupling chemistry. Here we demonstrate that the synergistic combination of copper catalysis and photoredox catalysis can provide a general platform from which to address this challenge. This cross-coupling system uses naturally abundant alkyl carboxylic acids and commercially available nitrogen nucleophiles as coupling partners. It is applicable to a wide variety of primary, secondary and tertiary alkyl carboxylic acids (through iodonium activation), as well as a vast array of nitrogen nucleophiles: nitrogen heterocycles, amides, sulfonamides and anilines can undergo C-N coupling to provide N-alkyl products in good to excellent efficiency, at room temperature and on short timescales (five minutes to one hour). We demonstrate that this C-N coupling protocol proceeds with high regioselectivity using substrates that contain several amine groups, and can also be applied to complex drug molecules, enabling the rapid construction of molecular complexity and the late-stage functionalization of bioactive pharmaceuticals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 364 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 26%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 92 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 239 66%
Chemical Engineering 5 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Unspecified 4 1%
Neuroscience 2 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 99 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,234,572
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#34,766
of 95,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,774
of 333,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#710
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.