↓ Skip to main content

Is the timing of caloric intake associated with variation in diet-induced thermogenesis and in the metabolic pattern? A randomized cross-over study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Obesity, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
70 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Is the timing of caloric intake associated with variation in diet-induced thermogenesis and in the metabolic pattern? A randomized cross-over study
Published in
International Journal of Obesity, July 2015
DOI 10.1038/ijo.2015.138
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Bo, M Fadda, A Castiglione, G Ciccone, A De Francesco, D Fedele, A Guggino, M Parasiliti Caprino, S Ferrara, M Vezio Boggio, G Mengozzi, E Ghigo, M Maccario, F Broglio

Abstract

Background/Objectivesfood-induced thermogenesis is generally reported to be higher in the morning although contrasting results exist due to differences in experimental settings related to the preceding fasting, exercise, sleeping, and dieting. In order to definitively answer to this issue, we compared the calorimetric and metabolic responses to identical meals consumed at 8:00 am and at 8:00 pm by healthy volunteers, after standardized diet, physical activity, duration of fast and resting.Subjects/Methods20 subjects (age range 20-35 years, BMI 19-26 kg/m(2)) were enrolled to a randomized cross-over trial. They randomly received the same standard meal in the morning, and 7 days after, in the evening, or vice versa. A 30-min basal calorimetry was performed; a further 60-min calorimetry was done 120-min after the beginning of the meal. Blood samples were drawn every 30-min for 180-min. General linear models (GLMs), adjusted for period and carry-over, were used to evaluate the 'morning effect', i.e. the difference of morning delta (after-meal minus fasting values) minus evening delta (after-meal minus fasting values) of the variables.Resultsfasting Resting-Metabolic-Rate (RMR) did not change from morning to evening; after-meal RMR values were significantly higher after the morning meal (1916; 95%CI 1792,2041 vs 1756; 1648,1863 kcal; P<0.001). RMR was significantly increased after the morning meal (90.5; 95%CI 40.4,140.6 kcal; P<0.001), while differences in areas-under-the-curve for glucose (-1800; -2564,-1036 mg/dl × h, P<0.001), log-insulin (-0.19; -0.30,-0.07 μU/ml × h; P=0.001) and fatty free acid concentrations (-16.1;-30.0,-2.09 mmol/l × h; P=0.024) were significantly lower. Delayed and larger increases in glucose and insulin concentrations were found after the evening meals.Conclusionsthe same meal consumed in the evening determined a lower RMR, and increased glycemic/insulinemic responses, suggesting circadian variations in the energy expenditure and metabolic pattern of healthy individuals. The timing of meals should probably be considered when nutritional recommendations are given. Mean [95%CI] P-values calculated by the t-test for paired data. RMR=Resting Metabolic Rate; DIT=Diet Induced Thermogenesis; RQ=Respiratory Quotient; CHO=carbohydrates.International Journal of Obesity accepted article preview online, 29 July 2015. doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.138.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 48 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Sports and Recreations 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 62 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#281,061
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Obesity
#158
of 4,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,970
of 276,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Obesity
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.