Title |
Erroneous identification of APOBEC3-edited chromosomal DNA in cancer genomics
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1038/bjc.2014.176 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
R Suspène, V Caval, M Henry, M S Bouzidi, S Wain-Hobson, J-P Vartanian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
Researcher | 5 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,899,335
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#3,241
of 10,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,843
of 227,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#28
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.