| Title |
A regulatory circuit for piwi by the large Maf gene traffic jam in Drosophila
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature08501 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kuniaki Saito, Sachi Inagaki, Toutai Mituyama, Yoshinori Kawamura, Yukiteru Ono, Eri Sakota, Hazuki Kotani, Kiyoshi Asai, Haruhiko Siomi, Mikiko C. Siomi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 50% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 19% |
| Unknown | 43 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 164 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,300,229
of 25,204,049 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#51,219
of 96,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,501
of 102,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#267
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,204,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.