↓ Skip to main content

Efficient targeted resequencing of human germline and cancer genomes by oligonucleotide-selective sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
80 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Efficient targeted resequencing of human germline and cancer genomes by oligonucleotide-selective sequencing
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nbt.1996
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Myllykangas, Jason D Buenrostro, Georges Natsoulis, John M Bell, Hanlee P Ji

Abstract

We describe an approach for targeted genome resequencing, called oligonucleotide-selective sequencing (OS-Seq), in which we modify the immobilized lawn of oligonucleotide primers of a next-generation DNA sequencer to function as both a capture and sequencing substrate. We apply OS-Seq to resequence the exons of either 10 or 344 cancer genes from human DNA samples. In our assessment of capture performance, >87% of the captured sequence originated from the intended target region with sequencing coverage falling within a tenfold range for a majority of all targets. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) called from OS-Seq data agreed with >95% of variants obtained from whole-genome sequencing of the same individual. We also demonstrate mutation discovery from a colorectal cancer tumor sample matched with normal tissue. Overall, we show the robust performance and utility of OS-Seq for the resequencing analysis of human germline and cancer genomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 4%
Germany 4 2%
United States 4 2%
China 3 1%
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 187 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Other 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 8%
Student > Master 9 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 11 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Computer Science 3 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 19 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,353,863
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#3,150
of 8,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,890
of 156,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#26
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.