景気後退とCO2の排出減少は同時進行のはずなのに、日本では景気後退とCO2の排出がどちらも進行しているのようなPRがされているなぜだろう? https://t.co/O2ZvS597YA https://t.co/O2ZvS597YA
@Daniel_Ospina @Noahpinion For carbon emissions, there is absolute reduction in some countries, which has to do with transition from coal to natural gas (and lesser extent solar, wind or nuclear). But a defining factor was also slower growth - see here for
@amcafee Notwithstanding Trump, I think it is possible, yes. What I am saying is that whether growth is 1 or 3% per year will make a huge difference. Decline since 1997 was to a large extent due to the recession and subsequent slow down - https://t.co/5Xg9
RT @GarrigouAnneSo: Just learning about this, and thinking that the best thing for the planet would be a good old recession! US: 10% decre…
Just learning about this, and thinking that the best thing for the planet would be a good old recession! US: 10% decrease in carbon dioxide emissions between 2007 & 2009 “was primarily the result of the economic recession” https://t.co/RKs66xU5kr
RT @ricyet: Why economists must think much more about climate change. For the US "before 2007, rising emissions were primarily driven by ec…
RT @ricyet: Why economists must think much more about climate change. For the US "before 2007, rising emissions were primarily driven by ec…
RT @ricyet: Why economists must think much more about climate change. For the US "before 2007, rising emissions were primarily driven by ec…
Why economists must think much more about climate change. For the US "before 2007, rising emissions were primarily driven by economic growth. After 2007, decreasing emissions were largely a result of economic recession with changes in fuel mix". https://
Natural gas gets too much credit for the decade of decreases in U.S. CO2 emissions. It was certainly part of the story, but so are renewables and especially the 2008 recession. https://t.co/KnOHedB9EK https://t.co/KhQeI7cGnZ @KlausHubacek /5
@Donut_Destoyer See “Fuel Mix”. Nice try. Better luck next time. https://t.co/NRgB5FKnYn https://t.co/fXoilEACgU
@AukeHoekstra @davidbent @ProfTimJackson @nephologue Well there is empirical evidence that degrowth had an impact on GHG emissions in the USA https://t.co/z1G9TwEqaQ. Also an important lesson for innovation. Yes it's necessary. But no sufficient. Policy &a
@JesseJenkins @thiesbeckers @ShellenbergerMD @MLiebreich @amedsker @Arne_JJ @KenCaldeira @mark_lynas @Kaikenhuippu @BNW_Ben @GeorgeMonbiot @kirstygogan @Daniel_W_See @carnegiescience Is this a published accounting? We’ve done some analysis on this, and som
@cohan_ds (as I'm sure you know) there has been debate about the extent to switch the switch to gas contributed https://t.co/PjIwjumg5Y
@bertvandorp zelfde uitstoot lijkt mij niet, maar het ligt iig wat genuanceerder https://t.co/pifSCZyUJ8
@LBalcerowicz Nie jest to prawda, glownym powodem bylo zmniejszenie produkcji. https://t.co/M8Lnl96DCo
RT @valmasdel: One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co…
Evolución de CO2 de USA y sus causas. Estudios muestran q las disminuciones son ppalmente x acciones a nivel estatal/ciudad #Cambioclimatico https://t.co/xy4Y2Pa4pg
RT @valmasdel: One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co…
RT @valmasdel: One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co…
RT @valmasdel: One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co…
RT @valmasdel: One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co…
RT @valmasdel: One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co…
One analysis of the drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 ; are there more recent ones? https://t.co/sT2NWtLB2o https://t.co/vPkcqMexZ2
.@jonnypeace Not only that, but methane emissions redux not "voluntary" at all. Result of recession. https://t.co/xkwnMUmm5C #cutmethane https://t.co/UXsmguarQG
Simply untrue. Reductions in methane emissions are due to the Great Recession lowering consumption https://t.co/xkwnMUmm5C #cutmethane https://t.co/CZRtpVHaHO
@JoachimBOlsen Og at analyser af energipol i USA peger på økonomi som primær årsag til CO2-reduktion: https://t.co/yZQDWbvteJ @DebattenDR2
RT @esufin: To nie zastąpienie węgla gazem łupkowym jest głównym powodem spadku emisji CO2 w USA - pokazuje analiza naukowa #gazlupkowy htt…
To nie zastąpienie węgla gazem łupkowym jest głównym powodem spadku emisji CO2 w USA - pokazuje analiza naukowa #gazlupkowy https://t.co/bqF7BlpL0i
RT @FoEE_Antoine: The #gas industry really loves this new but sad post-fact era. No link btw #shalegas boom & CO2 reduction in the US: http…
The #gas industry really loves this new but sad post-fact era. No link btw #shalegas boom & CO2 reduction in the US: https://t.co/jk9rRVhNfP https://t.co/31GSfsQ1WB
Paper #7 https://t.co/saiHzQM2xn The coal/natural gas transition may not have significantly contributed to recent US CO2 emissions decrease
Drivers of the US #CO2 Emissions 1997 - 2013 https://t.co/zo1lOAvlTl
RT @westernlaw: Some say US GHG decline is thanks to voluntary industry actions to #cutmethane. Nope. It's the recession. The proof: https:…
Some say US GHG decline is thanks to voluntary industry actions to #cutmethane. Nope. It's the recession. The proof: https://t.co/1vIBX20tEr
I would say that the use of the term "progress" should be couched. https://t.co/0WtC0PVKwa https://t.co/CCho7Ec9Lw
RT @fpesanet: Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://…
RT @fpesanet: Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://…
Onderzoek toont aan dat #schaliegas in US een verwaarloosbare rol heeft gespeeld bij daling #CO2 uitstoot: http://t.co/uVRGVKGWjD #shalegas
Voor eens en altijd: #schaliegas NIET oorzaak daling #CO2 uitstoot VS: https://t.co/9isDyY3haB Studie: http://t.co/uVRGVKGWjD #klimaatzaak
On #qanda, Naomi Klein's assertion re:cause of reduction in U.S.carbon emissions was correct http://t.co/LOnRJiGCDH & http://t.co/fACy27xEux
Nature: la Grande Récession a plus contribué à la réduction des émissions US que le switch charbon-gaz (de schistes) http://t.co/QNox63vrGj
RT @IanA_Aus: @Gay_Alcorn @MargaretClark12 #factcheck Klein is correct. Switzer isn't. http://t.co/JuGo10ZR0e http://t.co/8LlRjCM0Xm
Midi info - René Vézina erre en affirmant une réduction de GES par le GNL - http://t.co/XmQ0eVogrL Voir ici: http://t.co/kW4lkdLmMv #polQc
@PICSCanada: Your newsletter pins past drop in US emissions on coal to gas shift. Sadly, it's mostly due to recession http://t.co/DLVNfd8b82
America's reduced carbon emissions a result of recession, not a switch from coal to gas. Read for more energy mix fun http://t.co/YRFqeUPRKb
America's reduced carbon emissions a result of recession, not a switch from coal to gas. Read for more energy mix fun http://t.co/YRFqeUPRKb
Is @TheBTI reviewing the Feng et al report re fuel mix for impact on US emissions? @MichaelBTI http://t.co/O8d2m2HZfl http://t.co/Ila2qpiDGU
gaz de #schiste : peu d'effet sur le bilan C des USA http://t.co/KcRZMCQ1eM et...on a pas tenu compte du méthane!! http://t.co/IfPf6tfJOW p6
#gaznat Encore une preuve que le gaz naturel n'est pas une énergie de transition souhaitable et efficace pour les CC http://t.co/IfPf6txkGu
Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://t.co/VkHo2syhT4
Population growth is a factor in co2 emissions no matter if you like it or not .http://t.co/O7li5rXZDN
@DrNduagu If report in http://t.co/ucoqu4kKhj is the best that SDA can make of the data, why was it published? #climatechange mafia perhaps?
Recession caused U.S. emissions to drop ~11% between 2007 and 2013, study says. http://t.co/OReJn0IkBI #openaccess
Recession caused U.S. emissions to drop ~11% between 2007 and 2013, study says. http://t.co/OReJn0IkBI #openaccess
Substitution of gas for coal had a relatively minor role in the emissions reduction of US CO2 emissions since 2007 http://t.co/7VhDhRJ5ps
ELEEP members are talking about #emissions & #fracking. Here are some links they referenced: http://t.co/UojryNdkxf http://t.co/GXLpZvZnNE
ELEEP members are talking about emissions & fracking. Here are some links they referenced: http://t.co/UojryNdkxf http://t.co/GXLpZvZnNE
The 'mystery' of less US C emissions. No decoupling, no renewables, no nuclear. Just recession…@TheBTI @MichaelBTI http://t.co/nJMXedtXNF
The 'mystery' of less US C emissions. No decoupling, no renewables, no nuclear. Just recession…@TheBTI @MichaelBTI http://t.co/nJMXedtXNF
The 'mystery' of less US C emissions. No decoupling, no renewables, no nuclear. Just recession…@TheBTI @MichaelBTI http://t.co/nJMXedtXNF
Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 http://t.co/1fPQ9qBv2h
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
New study says #shale gas has had relatively minor role in cutting US CO2 emissions since 2007 http://t.co/DNJFqGhmda
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
Study: decrease in US CO2 emissions was mainly bc of the recession, not from switch to natural gas http://t.co/zqFKuvQSRa #fracking #climate
Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://t.co/VkHo2syhT4
Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 http://t.co/NzywAhl0EO
Reports in @Nature suggest 11% reduction in US CO2 emissions are principally down to economic downturn not fracking. http://t.co/wmJqBrpYBb
Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://t.co/VkHo2syhT4
Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://t.co/VkHo2syhT4
Emissions reductions in #US due to #recession & #energy switch. But MAINLY due to recession. http://t.co/Gb0buQntdE http://t.co/VdK54dGSb1
@somuchnate @JosephKay76 @without_pity @out_woods @lasophielle @aut_omnia this should be useful http://t.co/QOCn39xrUl
El descenso emisiones de CO2 en EEUU no es gracias a #fracking sino a descenso del consumo, lo que sí aumenta es CH4 http://t.co/fT2Ytsj7l1
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
Has gas actually played smaller role in GHGs slowdown than we think? Drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 http://t.co/ClRtdQv3IL #natgas
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
#Fracking impact on CO2 cuts in US emissions 'a myth' Summary: http://t.co/LMygnEWHOI Paper: http://t.co/YnArUYsKZP http://t.co/XWpud9xQdV
#Fracking impact on CO2 cuts in US emissions 'a myth' Summary: http://t.co/LMygnEWHOI Paper: http://t.co/YnArUYsKZP http://t.co/XWpud9xQdV
El descenso emisiones de CO2 en EEUU no es gracias a #fracking sino a descenso del consumo, lo que sí aumenta es CH4 http://t.co/fT2Ytsj7l1
Has gas actually played smaller role in GHGs slowdown than we think? Drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 http://t.co/ClRtdQv3IL #natgas
Study of U.S. CO2: economic change biggest factor with population growth a constant stimulant. http://t.co/QiHcpzA8xB http://t.co/VkHo2syhT4
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
Reports in @Nature suggest 11% reduction in US CO2 emissions are principally down to economic downturn not fracking. http://t.co/wmJqBrpYBb
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
Decline in US CO2 emissions not due to switching from coal to gas as often reported http://t.co/bIJrWUpGVw http://t.co/nitoUWDk8q
Decline in US CO2 emissions not due to switching from coal to gas as often reported http://t.co/bIJrWUpGVw http://t.co/nitoUWDk8q
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
Impact of Recession v Fuel Mix: Nice piece by @klaushubacek et al @NatureComms Drivers of US CO2 emissions 1997-2013 http://t.co/GDZaRXL0LD
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq
El descenso emisiones de CO2 en EEUU no es gracias a #fracking sino a descenso del consumo, lo que sí aumenta es CH4 http://t.co/fT2Ytsj7l1
La caída de emisiones de CO2 en EEUU NO se debe fundamentalmente al #fracking, sino a cambios en patrones de consumo. http://t.co/nQPO901byq